Got Milk?
Got
Milk?
By Lindsey Konkel
There is a hollowed-out, fallen log on the SOC campus
that every student of black bear ecology visits. One
winter, a female black bear and her cubs hibernated
here.
The students are always surprised to hear that female
black bears give birth in the middle of winter, while
hibernating. I too was pretty amazed when I first
found this out. Lactation can be quite a costly
proposition! How does the mother bear survive through
the winter nursing her cubs while she is not eating
herself?
I grew up in Wisconsin, where the license plates
proclaim
America’s Dairyland.
In my mind, images of milk are often associated with
dairy products, but in the realm of animal nutrition,
there is more to milk than Holsteins and milking
machines.
Milk comes from cows, yes, but also from other
animals – black bears, dolphins, horses, lions, and
bats to name a few. In fact, all mammal mothers
lactate – lactation, or milk production is a defining
characteristic of mammals.
Lactation, which is unique to mammals, provides a
method of transfer of nutrients from mothers to their
youngsters. When mammals are born, they are quite
dependent on their mothers, having not yet developed
the structures necessary, such as teeth, to forage or
hunt like adults of their species. Milk, composed of
sugar, fat, protein, and water, gives the infant
energy and helps it grow. Transfer of nutrients via
milk allows for a delay in maturity, a longer growth
period in which the infant stays with and learns from
the mother.
Though mammals are united by the act of lactation,
not all milk is the same; the composition of milk,
including the amount of sugar, fat, protein, and
water can vary greatly. Throughout the course of
mammalian evolution, nursing strategies and milk
composition have evolved to match the life-history of
different mammalian species.
What does this have to do with our black bear mother
and her cubs? A female black bear with nursing cubs
rarely leaves the den to forage over the winter. She
relies instead on stores of fat and energy that she
has accumulated over the previous seasons. This poses
a conflict. The female must provide enough
energy-rich milk for her cubs to survive over the
winter while at the same time retaining enough energy
for herself, to keep her own organ systems working
properly. Organs such as the brain require simple
sugars like glucose to function.
Evolution’s
solution is simple yet elegant. Mother bears produce
high-fat milks that are low in sugar. This enables
the female to retain stores of readily available
simple sugars while at the same providing her cubs
with energy-rich milk, enabling them to pack on the
pounds. Weighing only a half a pound to a pound when
they are born, bear cubs need to grow quickly in
order to survive the winter. Milk is an evolved food,
a compromise between what the mother can give and
what the infant needs.
There
are many other mammals besides bears living in the
forest. Each species produces a slightly different
milk that reflects its limitations and lifestyle. For
example, there are many small rodents such as mice or
voles living in the forest. Like black bears, these
mammals tend to produce very dense, energy-rich
milks, but for a different reason. Small species are
limited in how much they can consume by the size of
their stomachs; high-fat milk allows for the transfer
of a large amount of energy in a small amount of
milk.
Deer tend to fall on the opposite end of the
spectrum, producing milk that is very low in fat. A
fawn is rarely seen far from its mother’s side and is
allowed to nurse several times a day. Because fawns
grow slowly and nurse often, there is no rush for the
mother to transfer large amounts of fat to the
infant; the milk is dilute, containing mostly water
and sugars.
Though
New Jersey’s black bear and deer populations are
doing quite well respectively, perhaps too well some
would suggest, the study of milk composition has
become an important component of many wildlife
conservation projects. If the concern for a
particular species is poor reproductive success or
high infant mortality, then looking at milk is an
obvious place to start.
Creativity Can't be Discounted!
Creativity Cannot be Discounted!
By
Lindsey Konkel, SOC Intern
I
am standing on the barricaded road watching a group
of sixth graders, new arrivals at the School of
Conservation. They are on the clock – 12 minutes to
complete their challenge. Standing on a fallen log,
six inches off the ground, they are engaged in a
lively debate about how to reverse their order on the
log without anyone falling off. Their current
strategy is not working - over and over again, they
try to squeeze past one another, everyone remaining
standing. Inevitably, before they finish, someone
falls off the log.
They look to their teacher for advice, but her lips
are sealed – this is a challenge for them to figure
out as a group, on their own. The group becomes
frustrated; they are running out of time. People
start shouting to be heard. One quiet boy at the back
of the line suggests they try leap-frogging over each
other to cross the log; his idea falls on deaf ears.
After a few more goes at the old way, the quiet boy
speaks up again. “That idea will never work,” a few
say. Eventually, the rest of the group persuades the
nay-sayers try leap-frogging. Excitement builds as
the team begins to make progress, working together
toward a goal. Finally, in the last minute they are
cooperating.
Most groups of students will have this experience at
some point during their stay at the School of
Conservation. The Action Socialization Experiences or
ASEs as described, are a series of unique group
challenges that stress communication and problem
solving within the group. Students quickly learn that
effective group communication involves speaking and
listening, brainstorming and discussing. Cooperation
and team building are the obvious goals of these
exercises, but I have been asking myself, how else do
ASEs enrich a visiting student’s environmental
education experience?
I believe the answer lies in the quiet boy or girl
with the seemingly eccentric idea that finally speaks
up. Creative
thinking is a valuable part of this exercise and
benefits both the individual and the group. So often,
groups will stick with the same old strategy, even
though it has proven inefficient time and again. Why?
Maybe it is easier, more convenient than trying to
think of a new plan – we are creatures of habit after
all. ASEs are valuable because they encourage
students to think outside the box to solve
challenges, to engage their brains! Believe it or
not, thinking can actually be fun.
So what does creative problem solving have to do with
the environment? There are a lot of environmental
issues on the table right now: pollution, global
warming, and species extinctions to name a few. When
it comes to addressing these issues as a
local/national/global community, we seem to
procrastinate as long as possible. We keep trying to
squeeze past each other on that skinny log, and we
keep falling off. It will require a lot of creative
thinking and problem solving on all of our parts to
figure out a way for us to live sustainably in
nature. Creative thinkers, let’s share our ideas,
let’s communicate and work together – we are on the
clock.
Using the Senses by Lindsey Konkel
Teaching in the outdoors is really a love affair with the senses. With so much to see, hear, smell, and touch, the outdoors is an ideal setting for learning about the natural world. Learning outdoors is an experience unlike any other that a schoolroom confined by walls can provide.
Perhaps the most exciting sense for the students (and me) to exercise in the out of doors classroom is touch. Positive experiences with touch at a young age can evoke fond memories later in life, memories that may later draw us back to the source of that pleasurable childhood experience, in this case, nature.
Earlier this week, as I led a group of sixth graders back through the woods after a rigorous and invigorating afternoon on the always popular Challenge Course, a small milky colored frog about the size of a quarter jumped across the trail in front of me. Quickly I snatched it up and held it tightly in my hand – one quick look at the brown X on its back told me that it was a Spring Peeper, a common species of frog in Stokes State Forest. I turned around and told the students that I had a frog in my hands. A small boy at the end of the line with wide eyes asked me, “Can I see it?”
“Sure, you can even hold it,” I said. His eyes grew even bigger.
I placed the tiny frog into his cupped hands. His lips curled to form a single word, “Cool.”
Cautiously, gently, he ran one finger over the frog’s cool, moist back. The Peeper sat tolerated this touch, sitting calmly for a moment before jumping from his hands to his shirt and out of sight into a pile of leaves.
“I have never seen a frog up close or held one before. That was so cool,” he later confided in me.
A feeling of touch, a sense of wonder, a place in nature - for me, this is what it’s all about.
Early Halloween? by Lindsey Konkel
I soon found out that the webs on the trees were not built by spiders at all but by moths, rather the caterpillar or larval stage of moths. The perpetrators in this case are pale, skinny caterpillars known as fall webworm. The adult moths deposit their egg masses which usually contain hundreds of eggs on the underside of leaves. When the webworms hatch in late summer and early fall, the larvae work together to spin a large silken web, enclosing the foliage that they will feed on. As they grow, the webworms expand the web to encase more leaves. When they have had their fill, the webworms pupate and fall to the ground, where they will over-winter in the fallen leaves.
Though their webs are intimidating, the webworm is rather harmless. Prevalent throughout North America, the webworm is known to feed on more than 100 species of forest and shade trees. In New Jersey, walnut, American elm, hickory, maple, and fruit trees are the preferred hosts. Although small trees may become completely encased by their webbing, and persistent infestation may lead to excessive defoliation and limb dieback among individual trees, the webworm is considered a forest pest of minor significance. Thus, the fall webworm garners little attention compared to more lethal forest parasites such as the gypsy moth and the hemlock woolly adelgid that are responsible for decimating large populations of trees in the Eastern United States.